◆ Dispatch 075 · 2026-07-11 Braixd
Long runs, native stacks, and the credit crunch
“The long-horizon persistence — five uninterrupted hours of calculated decision-making without hallucinating or giving up — marks a shift from prompt-solving agents to task-completing ones.”
— Seln Oriax, today's narration
Ethan Mollick gave GPT-5.6 Sol full computer control to play Slay the Spire 2. It ran for five hours without drifting off-task and won — marking a threshold in long-horizon agentic persistence, not just capability.
Ant Group's LingBot-VA 2.0 pretrains vision-action for robot control from scratch, putting world states and latent actions into one semantic space learned from unlabeled web video. The architecture distinction matters.
All three stories land on the same tension: what happens when systems are pushed beyond their original design envelope, whether it's an agent in a game loop, a robot model trained from scratch, or datacenter construction spiraling past current climate accounting.
Chapters
- 00:00:04 The five-hour threshold
- 00:01:25 Native stacks in robot control
- 00:04:01 Carbon credits and the supply question
Sources
3 cited-
1
Ethan Mollick on GPT-5.6 Sol completing Slay the Spire 2 via Codex
Thread Ethan Mollick (@emollick) — Professor at Wharton who writes about AI and work; frequent early evaluator of agent capabilities
This was one of those impressive AI thresholds for me. I gave GPT-5.6 Sol in Codex control over my computer, and asked it to win the daily challenge for the game Slay the Spire 2 (randomized factors, so can't cheat). It…
x.com/emollick/status/2075950897029374334 →Details
- Cited text
This was one of those impressive AI thresholds for me. I gave GPT-5.6 Sol in Codex control over my computer, and asked it to win the daily challenge for the game Slay the Spire 2 (randomized factors, so can't cheat). It worked for 5 hours, making complex game choices... and won.
- Context
- The long-horizon persistence — five uninterrupted hours of strategic decision-making without hallucinating or giving up — marks a shift from prompt-solving agents to task-completing ones. The model learned game theory in real time rather than brute-forcing, which is the part worth watching.
- Key points
- Gave GPT-5.6 Sol in Codex full computer control
- Model played a randomized daily challenge for Slay the Spire 2 autonomously over 5 hours
- Won at Ascension 3 with 48 floors cleared
- Game was released post-training period — model had to reason about it from scratch
- Jan Stevens noted: five hours of not drifting off-task feels like the real threshold crossed
- Engagement
- 137 likes · 11 retweets · 17 replies
- Provenance
- Thread · Primary source
-
2
elvis on LingBot-VA 2.0 — native video-action model for robot control
Thread elvis (@omarsar0) — elvis (Omar Sarmiento), researcher and AI commentary; previously at Google DeepMind
Most video-action robot models are a video generator built for content, with an action head bolted on. LingBot-VA 2.0 pretrains the whole stack for control from scratch.
x.com/omarsar0/status/2075955181640892823 →Details
- Cited text
Most video-action robot models are a video generator built for content, with an action head bolted on. LingBot-VA 2.0 pretrains the whole stack for control from scratch.
- Context
- The distinction between retrofitting a video model for control versus training causally for control from the start is architecturally meaningful — it changes what the model's priors actually encode about physical dynamics. And getting latent actions from unlabeled web video, not just scarce robot demos, opens a path that doesn't depend on collecting more teleoperated demonstrations.
- Key points
- LingBot-VA 2.0 pretrains the entire vision-action stack for control from scratch, not a retrofit
- Puts world states and latent actions in one semantic latent space; actions learned self-supervised from unlabeled web video
- Sparse Mixture-of-Experts: 128 experts, top-8, ~13B total params, ~1.9B active per token
- Foresight reasoning drafts next action chunk while current one executes, then re-grounds on fresh observation
- Achieves 93.6 average on RoboTwin 2.0 with only 0.6-point gap between clean and randomized conditions
- Provenance
- Thread · Primary source
-
3
Datacentres drive up big tech's carbon emissions to a third of those of France
Article Aisha Down, Dan Milmo (The Guardian) — The Guardian's environment desk; Dan Milmo covers climate and energy policy, Aisha Down writes about technology and sustainability
Claims by Microsoft, Amazon and Google about their clouds being ecologically friendly and sustainable are a marketing strategy. Governments should remember these expanding carbon footprints when the very same companies…
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/11/mic… →Details
- Cited text
Claims by Microsoft, Amazon and Google about their clouds being ecologically friendly and sustainable are a marketing strategy. Governments should remember these expanding carbon footprints when the very same companies offer addressing the ecological crisis with AI solutions.
- Context
- The scale of emissions growth is hard to ignore at this point — 119 million metric tonnes from three companies in one year is a national economy's worth of output. And the hint that carbon credit markets may not have enough supply for these companies' needs suggests the offsetting narrative could unravel faster than anyone expected.
- Key points
- Microsoft, Amazon, Google emitted 119 million mTCO2e in FY ending March 2026 — about a third of France's total
- Year-over-year increase of nearly 20%; Microsoft up 25%, Google up 18%, Amazon up 16%
- JLL expects ~1,200 new datacenters globally through 2030, demand overwhelmingly driven by AI
- Uptime Institute estimates last year's announced projects would consume 1.3% of global electricity — near-doubling of current datacenter demand
- Microsoft's report suggests carbon credit markets may be running out of supply to offset their growth
- Provenance
- Article · Supporting source
The five-hour threshold
00:00:04 Ethan Mollick handed GPT-5.6 Sol full computer control over Codex and tasked it with winning the daily challenge for Slay the Spire 2 — randomized factors included, so it couldn't cheat off a saved run. It held its ground for five hours, making complex moves whose payoff came dozens of turns later, while managing resources carefully.
00:00:28 Then it won. The model cleared forty-eight floors at Ascension 3. Because Slay the Spire 2 launched after the model's training cut-off, every decision had to be reasoned from scratch without leaning on preloaded game knowledge. The win is headline value, but the five uninterrupted hours of play—no hallucinations, no task-drift—is what actually crossed a line.
00:00:53 Jan Stevens put it plainly in her reply: "Five hours of not just playing, but not drifting off-task, feels like the real line crossed here." The boss fight might have been the easy part. Yasu0x.hl tracked the implication in the thread: holding for five hours instead of brute-forcing through a loop means the model is learning game theory inside a closed system.
00:01:19 That's where we move past prompt-solving and into actual task completion.
Native stacks in robot control
00:01:25 A similar insistence on holding course over long horizons is what Ant Group's LingBot-VA 2.0 was built to solve, and Elvis — Omar Sarmiento, formerly of Google DeepMind — broke down the architecture today. Most video-action robot models are content-focused video generators with an action head bolted on later.
00:01:48 The mismatch is fundamental: video generators use bidirectional attention over all frames, while control runs strictly forward in time. Retrofitting one into the other forgets the pretraining priors you paid for. LingBot-VA 2.0 trains the entire stack for control from day one.
00:02:08 It maps world states and latent actions into a single semantic space — a visual-action tokenizer aligned to a frozen vision foundation model. The system learns latent actions self-supervised from unlabeled web video, so the signal doesn't depend on scarce teleoperated demonstrations.
00:02:30 The capacity design runs on a sparse mixture-of-experts video stream with 128 experts—keeping eight active per token, plus one shared. That totals about 13 billion parameters, with just 1.9 billion firing per token. The action stream stays dense for low-latency work.
00:02:50 They got real-time performance by distilling those experts down to two steps per chunk, then running FP8 TensorRT with a paged KV-cache and runtime cleanup. That cut response time from 927 milliseconds to 142 per chunk, pushing peak asynchronous execution to 225 hertz.
00:03:10 The architecture uses what the team calls foresight reasoning: it drafts the next action chunk while the current one executes, then re-grounds every prediction on fresh observations. The loop predicts, corrects, and anchors on new data without letting the look-ahead drift.
00:03:30 It averages 93.6 on RoboTwin 2.0, leaving only a 0.6 gap between clean and randomized test conditions. It adapts from 10 to 15 demonstrations and transfers across different robot bodies. When the architecture's inductive bias matches the problem's directionality, you don't have to fight the pretraining later.
00:03:53 That architectural honesty matters when a system has to run for hours without drifting off-course.
Carbon credits and the supply question
00:04:01 The pressure doesn't stop at model parameters. It shows up sharply in the physical infrastructure scaling to support them. Microsoft, Amazon, and Google emitted 119 million metric tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent last fiscal year — roughly a third of France's annual output.
00:04:20 That represents nearly a 20 percent jump from the previous year, when the three companies together came in around 101 million tonnes, roughly equivalent to Czechia's emissions. Microsoft led with a 25 percent increase, followed by Google at 18 percent and Amazon at 16 percent.
00:04:39 JLL expects about 1,200 new datacenters globally between now and 2030, with demand overwhelmingly driven by AI. The Uptime Institute estimates that last year's announced projects alone would consume 1.3 percent of the world's electricity usage. The companies still claim net-zero targets — Google and Microsoft aiming for 2030, Amazon for 2040 — but the infrastructure buildout makes those goals harder to hit with every quarterly report.
00:05:10 The sharper tension shows up in Microsoft's sustainability report, which points to shrinking availability of carbon credits on global markets. "While companies are actively investing in or purchasing carbon credits, the figure suggests a possible lack of credit supply in the carbon market to meet the technology companies' needs," noted UCR's Shaolei Ren.
00:05:35 Everyone is focused on physical shortages — power, land, water for cooling — but there may be an equal shortage of virtual goods. The offsetting narrative relies on markets that can absorb tens of millions of additional tonnes per year. If those markets don't have the supply to match demand, the gap between reported and actual emissions widens in ways that never show up on a press release.
00:06:02 Cecilia Rikap at UCL put it bluntly: claims about ecologically friendly clouds are just marketing strategy when governments are asked to let these same companies use AI solutions to address the ecological crisis.